Matt MiChael
GVPT200
Blog Post
Nuclear Weapons
For the last few decades, nuclear
weapons have been up for debate. It all started during world WWII with the race
to build these destructive weapons. Throughout the years the mere existence of
these weapons have caused fear and misery in the hearts of many defenseless countries.
Even now, there is a divide between countries who have nuclear weapons and
those who do not. Nuclear weapons are by far a threat to the survival of the
human race. Nuclear weapons should be disarmed due to its political injustice
and the danger it presents to people.
The presence of nuclear weapons
promotes coercion between certain countries. Countries use nuclear weapons as a
deterrence to prevent other countries to undertake an action. Deterrence
strategies consist of having the ability to use force. Nuclear weapons give
certain countries this power to haunt over their adversaries. Sometimes these
“adversaries” are nothing more than countries that have no means of defending
themselves are forced to comply because they feel they have no other choice. This
belittles countries preventing them from ever becoming a great power. While
using deterrence to prevent countries from taking certain unwanted actions,
compellence is also used to force another country to take certain actions.
These countries with nuclear weapons use their power to force other countries
to do certain actions they want to occur. The fear surrounding nuclear weapons
allows countries that are armed to get away with many more things compared to
other countries. The United States is one of five countries that are deemed a
nuclear weapon zone. Much fear resides with other countries and the U.S.
because of what the U.S. is capable of doing. This is why countries tend to be allies
of the United States rather than enemies. When the United States presents
sanctions against countries the rest of the world are more likely to agree. In
2012, the United States proposed sanction of Eritrea due to their possible aid
to Somalia militants. Afterwards, the United Nations backed the United States
with sanctions leaving a defenseless country in a state of even more political
and economic instability. Where is the justice in targeting a country that
cannot defend itself in ways others can?
The use of nuclear weapons was
clearly seen during WWII by the United States. The attacks on Japan at
Hiroshima and Nagasaki were an insightful viewing of how dangerous these
weapons are. These attacks killed and injured hundreds of thousands of people.
The impact of a nuclear bomb can be felt for years after it explodes, as the
radiation and gases can continue to make people sick. Nuclear weapons are the
deadliest weapons to have ever been created. Total disarmament is necessary to
preserve life, as we know it. If nuclear weapons were launched in one of
today’s modern cities such as New York, Los Angeles, London, etc. millions of
lives would be lost instantaneously. This should provide a clear understanding
of how devastating nuclear weapons are in the world.
I think you make really good points about compliance and deterrence. However, with the points that you make about the United States and how other nations fear the United States and tend to agree with the United States, I think we have to remember how many powerful countries are not the biggest fans of the United States. A lot of powerful countries that do have nuclear weapons are also feared just as much throughout the world even though they may not be as politically stable as the United States is.
ReplyDeleteYou make very good points about the effects that being a nuclear power may have on a country. I especially like the point where you refer to how the effects of nuclear weapons are long lasting when referring to the attacks made by the US on Japan at Hiroshima.
ReplyDelete